首页> 外文OA文献 >Planning research and educational partnerships with Indigenous communities : practice, realities and lessons
【2h】

Planning research and educational partnerships with Indigenous communities : practice, realities and lessons

机译:计划与土著社区的研究和教育合作伙伴关系:实践,现实和教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Increasingly planning practice and research are having to engage with Indigenous communities in Australia to empower and position their knowledge in planning strategies and arguments. But also to act as articulators of their cultural knowledge, landscape aspirations and responsibilities and the need to ensure that they are directly consulted in projects that impact upon their ‘country’ generally and specifically. This need has changed rapidly over the last 25 years because of land title claim legal precedents, state and Commonwealth legislative changes, and policy shifts to address reconciliation and the consequences of the fore-going precedents and enactments. While planning instruments and their policies have shifted, as well as research grant expectations and obligations, many of these Western protocols do not recognise and sympathetically deal with the cultural and practical realities of Indigenous community management dynamics, consultation practices and procedures, and cultural events much of which are placing considerable strain upon communities who do not have the human and financial resources to manage, respond, co-operate and inform in the same manner expected of non-Indigenous communities in Australia. This paper reviews several planning formal research, contract research and educational engagements and case studies between the authors and various Indigenous communities, and highlights key issues, myths and flaws in the way Western planning and research expectations are imposed upon Indigenous communities that often thwart the quality and uncertainty of planning outcomes for which the clients, research agencies, and government entities were seeking to create.
机译:越来越多的计划实践和研究必须与澳大利亚的土著社区合作,以增强其知识并在计划策略和论据中定位他们的知识。但也要充当其文化知识,景观愿望和责任的明确表达者,并需要确保直接或间接在影响其“国家”的项目中直接咨询他们。在过去的25年中,由于土地所有权主张的法律先例,州和联邦立法的变更以及为解决和解以及前述先例和法规的后果而进行的政策转变,这种需求已迅速改变。尽管规划工具及其政策发生了变化,研究经费和期望也有所变化,但许多西方协议并未承认并同情地处理土著社区管理动态,咨询实践和程序以及文化事件的文化和实践现实。其中给没有人力和财力来管理,响应,合作和提供澳大利亚非土著社区所期望的方式的人力资源造成很大压力。本文回顾了作者与各个土著社区之间的一些规划正式研究,合同研究和教育活动以及案例研究,并重点介绍了西方计划和研究对强加于土著社区的质量提出的关键问题,神话和缺陷客户,研究机构和政府实体正在寻求创建的计划结果的不确定性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Low Choy, Darryl; Jones, David;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号